Digital Compliance
What Ignoring Accessibility Can Actually Cost You
The Real Risk, Minus the Fear
Let's talk about cost honestly, because the accessibility industry loves to lead with a scary fine and hope you don't ask follow up questions. We'd rather give you the real picture, including the parts that are less dramatic than the sales pitch.
The maximums, and what has actually happened
Under Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, penalties on paper reach up to 50,000 dollars a day for an individual, and up to 100,000 dollars a day for a corporation. Those numbers are real. They're written into the Act, and they're the numbers you'll see at the top of most accessibility sales emails.
Here's what those emails leave out. The penalties Ontario has actually issued have been small, in the hundreds to low thousands of dollars. Every reported one has been for failing to file an accessibility compliance report, which is a paperwork obligation, not a judgement about a website. There is no publicly reported case of an Ontario business being penalized over an inaccessible site.
We'd rather you heard that from us than found it out later. Anyone quoting you the six figure daily number without the second half is selling fear, and it's fair to discount the rest of what they tell you accordingly.
Why that isn't the same as no risk
A quiet enforcement record isn't a promise about your situation. A few things sit underneath it:
- Compliance reports create a paper trail. If you're an organization large enough to have to file one, filing one that claims compliance you don't have is its own problem, and reporting is the one thing Ontario has demonstrably acted on.
- The Ontario's human rights law, which applies at any size and has no employee threshold doesn't care about your size. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act web standard only catches organizations with 50 or more employees, but the Code applies at any size and gives a person who couldn't use your site a route to the Human Rights Tribunal. That's a complaint brought by a customer, and it doesn't need a provincial inspector to start it.
- Outside Canada the picture is more active. If you sell into the US or the EU, you're working under different rules with a much longer list of filed cases behind them. That's where the movement actually is.
The cost that actually shows up
Set the penalty aside for a second, because this is the part that turns up every month. Customers who leave. Statistics Canada put it at 27 percent in its 2022 Canadian Survey on Disability, roughly one in four Canadians aged 15 and over with one or more disabilities, and 28 percent in Ontario. So if your checkout can't be completed with a keyboard, or your booking form fails silently for a screen reader, those aren't hypothetical people. They're abandoned carts and lost bookings you never see in your analytics, because they left before converting.
There's a reputational cost too. This company's website doesn't work for disabled people is a bad look that spreads, and it's a lot more expensive to repair after the fact than to prevent.
The cost of fixing it, for comparison
The thing about accessibility debt is that it's cheapest to pay down early. Catching issues in an audit and fixing them deliberately costs a fraction of what it costs to scramble after a complaint, a legal letter, or a public callout, when you're paying rush rates and doing damage control at the same time.
Honest framing: the giant fine is a low probability tail risk with no Canadian website precedent behind it. The steady bleed of lost customers, and the cost of fixing things in a hurry, are the near certain ones.
One more thing worth knowing, now that the audit covers two lanes. Accessibility is the half with almost no Canadian enforcement history. The privacy half is not: Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, Canada's federal privacy law, Quebec's Law 25 and Canada's Anti Spam Legislation, which governs what you send rather than what you collect have regulators with actual track records and published outcomes. If you're weighing where your real exposure sits, that's the more useful comparison, and it's a different answer than the accessibility sales emails imply.
The same question across every regime
So the real cost of ignoring accessibility usually isn't a dramatic penalty. It's quieter than that: business you're losing without noticing, and work that's a lot cheaper done calmly than done in a hurry. We're not lawyers and none of this is legal advice about your own position. If you want to know where you actually stand, the useful move is to look, and looking is a smaller job than most people expect.
Want to know where your own site stands? See what the audit covers, or reach out and we'll get the ball rolling.
Reach outJUMP BACK
All Why It Matters ArticlesDiscover more content by us